Immediately, it can be seen that there is a disparity
in the paradox, because of the concepts of 'infinite' and 'finite.'
This paradox is easy to solve. It only has to be understood that
there can be no comparison nor contrast between the infinite and the
finite. Only finite sets can be compared or contrasted with each
other. The purpose of sets is to compare or contrast objects in
Tspace, or ideas or concepts in Ispace, but an infinite set with an
infinite number of elements is too vast, and this concludes that a
comparison or contrast of the finite cannot be made with something
that continues to exist forever. The paradox proves that the
difference between the infinite and the finite is too great. The
only relationship between the two is that the infinite contains all
things finite. And, it's a fact, that anything finite cannot become
infinite, and this includes the abstract concept of potential
infinity. Therefore, the infinite power set cannot produce a paradox
with the finite power set, because there is no relationship between
the two.
Paradoxes are created in Ispace. They cannot and do not
exist in three dimensional reality where all things real exist.
Material objects and real life situations cannot be a paradox. In
Ispace, paradoxes can be solved and oftentimes they can become part
of the real world. But if they cannot be transposed to Tspace, then
most of the time they are not useful in the real world. Whenever a
paradox arises in any discipline in Ispace, it is usually because of
illogical manipulation of ideas or words, illogical semantics,
illogical concepts, or a contradiction in terms—but possibly other
paradox forming constructs could also be a factor.

 13   